Legal Opinion

Roy A. Oakley v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United States, Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United States v. Roy A. Oakley, Roy A. Oakley v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 29, 1956No. 13023_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

231 F.2d 775

98 U.S.App.D.C. 22

Roy A. OAKLEY et al., Appellants,

v.

Arthur E. SUMMERFIELD, Postmaster General of the United

States, et al., Appellees.

Arthur E. SUMMERFIELD, Postmaster General of the United

States, et al., Appellants,

v.

Roy A. OAKLEY et al., Appellees.

Roy A. OAKLEY et al., Appellants,

v.

Arthur E. SUMMERFIELD, Postmaster General of the United

States et al., Appellees.

Nos. 12918, 12971, 13023.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 31, 1956.

Decided March 29, 1956.

Mr. Josiah Lyman, Washington, D.C., for appellants in Nos. 12,918 and 13,023, and appellees…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oakley v. SummerfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Tourlanes Publishing Company v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United States, Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United States v. Tourlanes Publishing Company, Tourlanes Publishing Company v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tourlanes Publishing Company v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United States, Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United States v. Tourlanes Publishing Company, Tourlanes Publishing Company v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API