Legal Opinion

Porth v. Farrier

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1991No. 90-2045PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Chief Judge.

Kevin C. Porth, an inmate at the Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding that defendant prison officials did not violate Porth’s eighth amendment rights. Porth filed a civil rights action, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), alleging that his eighth amendment rights had been violated by the officers and guards at the reformatory when he was placed in a strip cell without clothes, bedding, or a mattress for approximately twelve hours. He argues that the district court erred by denying his motion for a directed verdict and submitting to the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Johnson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Buckley v. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Buckley v. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Hickey v. ReederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Johnson v. BoreaniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Peters v. Woodbury CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API