Legal Opinion

John Pell & Son, Inc. v. Protector Last Reinforcing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 5, 1914No. 1767Published

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Joseph Cross, District Judge. Suit in equity by the Protector Fast Reinforcing Company against John Pell & Son, Incorporated. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.

The patent now in dispute — No. 870,760, for a reinforced shoe-last, issued November 12, 1907, to the inventor, Winthrop B. Baker — has been sustained, and infringement has been found, in a comprehensive opinion of the District Court reported in 204 Fed. 453. The opinion displays the painstaking care and the marked ability that- characterized the work of the late Judge Cross, and we agree not only with his conclusions, but in the main with his reasoning also. He may perhaps have made one or two incorrect, or inadequate, statements' of fact, but they are not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Protector Last Re-Enforcing Co. v. John Pell & Son, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API