Legal Opinion

In re Jordan

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 1, 2016No. Case No. 15-51041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION OF THE DEBTORS’ CHAPTER 13 PLAN

John E. Hoffman, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. Introduction

Under the Bankruptcy Code, student loan debts are dischargeable only if repayment of the debts would impose an undue hardship on the debtors and their dependents. Adam Edward Jordan and Kimberley Jordan (collectively, the “Debtors”) have not attempted to demonstrate undue hardship, and their student loan debts therefore currently are nondischargeable. It is hornbook bankruptcy law that debtors remain personally liable for the entirety of their…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re EscarcegaUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Ray v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In re Ray)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018
  3. In re: DENNIS MICHAEL ESCARCEGA NANETTE MARIE SISK, Dba About Face Skin Care EUGENE EDWARD VICK MARK IRVIN CANDALLA JERI LYLE SALDUUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API