Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Honorable Howard F. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 26, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OGG, Acting Presiding Judge.

A petition for special action was filed in this court by the petitioners, Frank John Schultz and Wayne Aronson, requesting this court to set aside the trial court’s order which denied their motion to dismiss the indictments against them. The motion was based upon the denial of the petitioners’ rights to a speedy trial. Review by special action is appropriate in such a case. Boccelli v. State, 109 Ariz. 287, 508 P.2d 1149 (1973); Stone v. Wren, 22 Ariz. App. 165, 525 P.2d 296 (filed August 22, 1974) ; Williams v. Superior Court, 21 Ariz.App. 239, 517 P.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McConnell v. NewmanArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Boccelli v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stone v. WrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Williams v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Escalanti v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Schultz v. PetersonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Berger v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Collins v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Schultz v. PetersonArizona Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API