Legal Opinion

Lindenfeld v. Michigan Interstate Truck Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. Docket No. 24, Calendar No. 38,715PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff had judgment, in action under the death act (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 14061, 14062), for the killing of his wife in a collision of his ear, in which she was riding, with a truck of the CloverLeaf Truck Company.

The collision occurred on a hill on US-12, west of Coloma, about three o’clock in the morning of March 3, 1935. The pavement was slippery, from ice, frost or dampness or a combination of them, but the places and extent of such condition are in dispute.

A 60-foot train, consisting of a truck and two trailers, belonging to defendant Michigan Interstate Truck Company, was going east…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Camp v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Sipes v. Michigan Central Railroad Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Windoes v. ColwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McKay v. HargisMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Suarez v. KatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Stuive v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Tracy v. RubleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API