Legal Opinion

Susie Barnhill, Howard Pinder, Sr., Howard Pinder, Jr., and Fredi Clarke v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1960No. 18183_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This singular appeal is a product of the legal paradox of imposing federal excise taxes on business activities regarded as criminal in most states.

Four professional gamblers pleaded guilty to evading federal gambling taxes. 1 The district judge offered the defendants the choice between a jail sentence and probation carrying a condition that they give up gambling. 2 They chose probation. Now, however, they are unhappy with what to them in retrospect seems to have been Hobson's choice. They appeal, attacking as an abuse of judicial discretion the probationary condition…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard A. TonryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,011 United States of America v. Robert D. Alexander, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Howard G. Pinder, Sr., and Howard G. Pinder, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. John Scott AlarikCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Kenneth L. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API