Moore & Howell v. Steinbock
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE JOHNSON
delivered the opinion of the court:
This action arises from a petition filed by plaintiff, Moore & Howell, to register a foreign judgment under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 77, par. 88 et seq.) The circuit court sustained a motion by defendant, Robert Steinbock, a/k/a Robert S. Sinclair (hereinafter Steinbock), to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals that dismissal and we reverse.
Defendant cross-appeals from a judgment of the circuit court denying him relief under section 41 of the Illinois…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Richichi v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Serio v. SerioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Weiner v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BaltzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Gilmore v. GilmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Cantwell v. ReinhartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993