Legal Opinion

Moore & Howell v. Steinbock

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 1978No. 76-743PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE JOHNSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

This action arises from a petition filed by plaintiff, Moore & Howell, to register a foreign judgment under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 77, par. 88 et seq.) The circuit court sustained a motion by defendant, Robert Steinbock, a/k/a Robert S. Sinclair (hereinafter Steinbock), to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals that dismissal and we reverse.

Defendant cross-appeals from a judgment of the circuit court denying him relief under section 41 of the Illinois…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Richichi v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Serio v. SerioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Weiner v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BaltzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Gilmore v. GilmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Cantwell v. ReinhartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API