Adriatic Insurance Co. Inc. v. Willingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Sam Willingham, d/b/a Willingham's Body Shop, and against one of the defendants, Adriatic Insurance Company, Inc. ("Adriatic"), in a fraud case. Adriatic argues that the judgment is due to be reversed because the jury did not also return a verdict against the other defendant, an agent of Adriatic. Adriatic argues that because its liability was based solely on alleged misrepresentations made by its agent, the jury could not properly return a verdict against Adriatic without also returning a verdict against…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Joseph v. StaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Brackett v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- General Elec. Credit Corp. v. Alford & Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Mixon v. Seaboard System RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- BIRMINGHAM-JEFF. TRANSIT AUTH. v. ArvanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Chandler v. VirciglioCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Polk v. PolkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.