Carrero v. Dime Contractors

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baraseh, J.H.O.), entered April 7, 2005, which, after a hearing, deemed process timely served nunc pro tunc pursuant to CPLR 306-b, and (2) an order of the same court (Rosenberg, J.), entered June 14, 2005, which, in effect, denied their motion to vacate so much of the determination of the Judicial Hearing Officer as deemed service proper pursuant to CPLR 306-b.

Ordered that the order dated June 14, 2005 is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the…