Aldo Mario Lovisi and Margaret Lovisi v. A. E. Slayton, Jr., Superintendent, Leake Parrish, Superintendent
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge.
The petitioners in this habeas corpus proceeding, Aldo and Margaret Lovisi, husband and wife, were convicted in the state court of sodomy with each other in violation of Va.Code Ann. § 18.1-212.1 They challenged the constitutionality of the statute, as applied to them, through the state court system and then sought federal habeas corpus relief. After a hearing, the. district judge concluded that the Lovisis had waived their constitutional right to privacy in their marital conduct and, consequently, their right to contest their state convictions of sodomy with one…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Ronald Thaeter v. Palm Beach Co. Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Beller v. MiddendorfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- 37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 598, 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,223 Roger W. Rich v. Secretary of the Army, Major General Kenneth R. Dirks, M.D., Former Commander Philip A. Deffer, M.D., Brigadier GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Christopher Farrell v. Warren County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- People v. GarrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.