Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lucchesi v. Frederic N. Stimmell, M.D., Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 13, 1985No. Nos. 1 CA-CIV 6366, 1 CA-CIV 6623Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGrant, Judge

I concur in that portion of the majority opinion that reverses the summary judgment granted by the trial court in favor of defendant Samaritan Health Service.

I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion that affirms the partial summary judgment granted in favor of Dr. Stimmell on the appellant’s claim for intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress. I believe that reasonable persons could differ as to whether Dr. Stimmell’s conduct may reasonably be regarded as so extreme and outrageous as to permit recovery.

Arizona accepted the tort of intentional or reckless infliction…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API