Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Crosley

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1977No. 54339PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

This is an attempt to appeal from the action of the trial court. The trial court refused to issue a writ of habeas corpus and refused to hear the application for the writ in which the applicant alleges that a misdemeanor judgment of conviction is void. No appeal lies from the court’s action. See e. g. Nichlos v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 367, 255 S.W.2d 522 (1953); Mayes v. State, 538 S.W.2d 637 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). Since this is not a felony conviction, the habeas corpus proceeding is not governed by the provisions of Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P., and this Court will not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Nichlos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Ex Parte BurtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Ex Parte LangstonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ex Parte RenierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Ex Parte CanadaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Ex Parte Aftab Ali, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  5. Ex Parte KarlsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API