Legal Opinion

State v. Barkwell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1979No. 10913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Chief Judge.

Each count of the eight-count information charged defendant Barkwell with the offense of stealing. § 560.156.1 A jury found defendant not guilty of the charges contained in the first three counts and guilty of the charges contained in Counts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII and fixed the punishment at two years’ imprisonment on each of the latter counts. The judgment and sentence of the trial court directed that the sentences run consecutively. Defendant appeals.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and a brief summary is sufficient.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. HandleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State v. LemonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State v. TandySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Sweazea v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DownsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. GarrettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. ApplewhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. MannsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barkwell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API