State v. Salas
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.
Defendant appeals from an order of the district court dismissing his motion for postconviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
In an appeal from a denial of a motion for postconviction relief, the findings of the district court will not be disturbed unless they are clearly wrong. State v. Otey, 236 Neb. 915, 464 N.W.2d 352 (1991).
On May 31, 1988, following a jury-waived trial, the defendant was convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, and delivery of cocaine. The judgment was affirmed on his direct…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. OteyNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SalasNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. DomingusNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Massey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KeithleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BlankNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GarzaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2020