Henderson v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion
I have read this record carefully and I fail to find therein any basis for the contention that the court was a party to or sanctioned any agreement made with the co-defendants to the effect that if they would give testimony for the State against plaintiff in error upon the trial they would not themselves have imposed upon them capital punishment. I do not believe that any court should be a party to any such agreement, nor do I believe that the case of Ingraham v. Prescott, 111 Fla. 320, 149 So. 369 should be construed as sanctioning any such practice. Indeed the facts in that case did not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
- Ingram v. PrescottSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Kirkland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.