Legal Opinion

Cottingham v. Warden, Ohio Reformatory for Women

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 17, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00097Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JANISHCIA COTTINGHAM, Case No. 1:21-cv-97 Petitioner, Barrett, J. vs. Litkovitz, M.J. WARDEN, OHIO REPORT AND REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN, RECOMMENDATION Respondent. Petitioner, an inmate in state custody at the Ohio Reformatory for Women, in Marysville, Ohio, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging her convictions in the Hamilton County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas in Case No. B-1305052. This case is before the Court on the petition, respondent’s return of writ, and…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API