Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wipf v. Altstiel

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2016No. 27491Published

1DissentGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶ 16.] This case involves nothing more than a question of statutory construction. However, the majority's decision today results in serious damage to patient privacy by judicially creating a redaction exception to SDCL 19-19-503, South Dakota’s physician-patient privilege.7 In doing so, the majority relies on a number of decisions from other jurisdictions that analyze the purpose of their respective privileges rather than the plain meaning of those statutes. Like the cases upon which it relies, the majority’s result-oriented analysis overlooks the primary issue in this case: Whether the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Shamburger v. BehrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Roe v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio RegionOhio Supreme Court · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API