Legal Opinion

Young v. Starkey

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tie district court of tie district of San Francisco. Tie facts are stated in tie opinion of tie court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bennett, J.

The action veas brought to recover for services rendered by the plaintiff, as arbitrator. Tie defendants and one Bring agreed to submit certain matters in difference between them to the decision of the plaintiff The agreement between the defendants and Bring contained, among other provisions, the following :—

“ In the event of the award of the said Charles B. Young “ in favor of Starkey, Janion & Co. being less than the amount w they now claim, then they, the said Starkey, Janion & Co., “ agree to pay the said Charles B. Young for the said exami- “ nation and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. CollinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Paine v. Kentucky Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Russell v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API