Legal Opinion

Sidney Ross Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 22, 1932No. Docket No. 37706Published

The amount of certain advances made by petitioner in 1921 to its branch office in China, which it carried on its books as accounts receivable and charged off in 1923, held, upon the record, not to be shown to have represented a loss sustained in 1923.

1Opinion of the Court

SIDNEY ROSS COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Sidney Ross Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 37706.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

26 B.T.A. 499; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1300;

June 22, 1932, Promulgated

The amount of certain advances made by petitioner in 1921 to its branch office in China, which it carried on its books as accounts receivable and charged off in 1923, held, upon the record, not to be shown to have represented a loss sustained in 1923.

Frederic E. Reeve, C.P.A., for the petitioner;

George R. Sherriff, Esq., for the respondent.

LEECH

The Commissioner has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sidney Ross Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API