Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crooks v. Cummins

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1930No. File No. 6836PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is a proceeding under the provisions of article 2 of chapter 295, Laws 1923 (Uniform Illegitimacy Act), seeking to establish that defendant was the father of relator’s illegitimate child and to enforce his obligation to support such child. The verdict of the jury was in favor of plaintiff, and judgment was entered thereon, declaring the paternity of the child and requiring defendant to make certain payments for the support of the child, from which judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant has appealed.

It became an issue in the ease whether or not certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RynoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. McKay v. . LasherNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. State ex rel. Patterson v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ulmer v. Gentner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1883
  5. Weaver v. CuffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. F. v. M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Vander Werf v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Schumacher v. SchumacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State ex rel. Conroy v. PluckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Keuck v. GamberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API