Legal Opinion

Matter of Rydeen v. Monarch Furniture Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The quarrel in this case between the two employees Rydeen and Foster arose we think out of and in the course of the employment. The dispute which resulted in Rydeen’s injury was over the work which Foster was expected to do and which he had neglected. This brings the claim within the cases of Matter of Knocks v. Metal Packing Corp. (231 N. Y. 78) and Matter of Heitz v. Ruppert (218 N. Y. 148). In the latter case we held that when one employee injures another in a quarrel over the manner of working together in a common employment, the accident ‘arose out of the employment if it was connected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Matter of Knocks v. . Metal Packing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Claim of Field v. Charmette Knitted Fabric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Mazarredo v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Ætna Life Ins. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. Fey v. BobrinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API