Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Hohenstein
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
By their separation agreement, defendant (the husband) and plaintiffs decedent (the wife) provided that during her lifetime the wife would have sole use and occupancy of the marital home — a rent-controlled apartment for which there has been no lease for over 10 years — but that on her death the husband would succeed to that right. While the wife was in occupancy, *1019a plan for cooperative conversion was accepted for filing by the Attorney-General. During the exclusive period for existing tenants to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MTR OF HERZOG v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Herzog v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- De Kovessey v. Coronet Properties Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Burns v. 500 East 83rd Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cooper v. 140 East AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brower v. BrowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Steier v. SchreiberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006