Woodley v. Howse
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Sloan, J.:
This was an action for a declaratory judgment to construe the will of R. W. Ross, deceased, and to determine whether plaintiffs have a merchantable title in fee simple to certain lands described in the petition. The trial court found that the will created a fee-tail estate and that the entail had been barred by the conveyance of the real estate, and rendered judgment accordingly. The defendant appeals.
The last will and testament of R. W. Ross, deceased, was duly and regularly admitted to probate on the 23d day of November, 1916. The portion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gardner v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Gardner v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Ewing v. NesbittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Allen v. PedderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Berthoud v. McCuneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Coleman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Brann v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Smyth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Delp v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Gibbs v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.