Legal Opinion

Risinger v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1969No. 17227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

The appellee Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland sued the appellant Donald W. Risinger and one Hugh M. Hart-son, alleged to have been doing business as Hartson Bureau of Investigation, for reimbursement of a loss alleged to have been sustained when it paid a claim of its insured, Samuels & Co., Inc., hereinafter called Samuels, under a burglary policy. It developed that Hartson had sold the Hartson Bureau'of Investigation to appellant prior to the events in question, and Hartson’s motion for summary judgment was sustained, and no one challenges the correctness of that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Statler Hotels v. Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. General American Life Ins. Co. v. GantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. SalsmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John Chezik Buick Co. v. Friendly Chevrolet Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. Traylor v. Unitedbank OrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. FrederickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Little v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Ramsey, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API