Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Metropolitan Transportation Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CPLR 504 (1) would ordinarily place venue in Westchester County (see Powers v East Hudson Parkway Auth., 75 AD2d 776 [1980]; see also Chitayat u Princeton Restoration Corp., 289 AD2d 102 [2001]). However, when plaintiff named the Metropolitan Transportation Company as a defendant, a conflict arose between CPLR 504 (1) and 505 (a). Thus, the court had the discretion to choose a venue proper for at least one of the par*559ties or claims (CPLR 502). The court did not abuse its discretion when it left venue in Bronx County, where the motor vehicle accident occurred and where defendant bus driver…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powers v. East Hudson Parkway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Chitayat v. Princeton Restoration Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API