Joyce v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentCappy, Justice
I respectfully dissent. In determining that the referee’s findings of fact regarding a modification of disability benefits were supported by substantial evidence, the majority concludes that Appellant William Joyce failed to make a good faith effort to follow through on his employer’s job referrals. I respectfully disagree with this conclusion; first, because it is based upon pure speculation as the referee made no specific findings of fact on which he rested his determination of a lack of good faith; and second, because the grounds upon which the majority relies fail to establish that Mr.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCray v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Vinglas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987