Fisher v. Young
New York Supreme Court
On the 31st day of December, 1901, a judgment was rendered in the above entitled action in favor of the plaintiff, Edward B. Fisher, and against the defendant, William M. Young, for the sum of seven hundred and eleven and 73/100 dollars ($711.73), which judgment was docketed in Sullivan county on the 31st day of December, 1901. On the 16th day of October, 1903, an execution against the person of said William H. Young was issued which reads as follows, to wit: “ People of the…
Read the full summary
On the 31st day of December, 1901, a judgment was rendered in the above entitled action in favor of the plaintiff, Edward B. Fisher, and against the defendant, William M. Young, for the sum of seven hundred and eleven and 73/100 dollars ($711.73), which judgment was docketed in Sullivan county on the 31st day of December, 1901. On the 16th day of October, 1903, an execution against the person of said William H. Young was issued which reads as follows, to wit: “ People of the State of New York, to the Sheriff of the County of Sullivan, Greeting: “ Whereas, Judgment was rendered on the 31st day…
1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.
It may be laid down as a general principle, I think, that local administrative or executive officers are only to discharge the duties of such office within the boundaries of the locality for which they are. elected or appointed ; and the correlative proposition, that administrative or executive duties that are to be performed or executed in any locality are to be discharged and executed by the local officials for that locality, is also true; that is to say, that sheriffs are to perform their duties within the counties in and for which they are elected; and that any legal process that must be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Love v. HumphreyNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- People ex rel. Bicinelli v. DunnNew York Supreme Court · 1898