Legal Opinion
Meisenhelder v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 25, 1927No. 25,697PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibede, J.
Action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate who was Mlled in Illinois while in the employ of the defendant in interstate commerce. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $8,250, of which $5,000 was apportioned by the jury to Louise D’Albani as his widow, and $3,250 to their infant son. Upon motion the court struck from tie verdict tie amount of tie award to Louise D’Albani, permitted tie award of $3,250 to tie son to stand, and denied tie plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. He appeals.
Tie employers liability act provides tiat tie cause of action given tie employe “siall…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KenneySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. HolbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matter of Estate of CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Mpiliris v. Hellenic Lines, LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Lawson v. United States. Retz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- In Re Estate of KinkeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- In Re Mortenson's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.