Legal Opinion

Solow v. Domestic Stone Erectors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered August 6, 1999, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The corporate defendants mischaracterize the theory of this case, which does not involve traditional veil-piercing to hold *200corporate owners, shareholders or other corporations liable for corporate obligations. Instead, as we have held, the theory of this case is that all four defendants should be treated as a single personality by reason of defendant Cohen’s use of “his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Solow v. Domestic Stone Erectors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holme v. Global Minerals & Metals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. IMAX Corp. v. Essel GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Pourquoi M.P.S., Inc. v. Worldstar International, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Solow v. Domestic Stone Erectors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API