St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Conly
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
The appellant is a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce. This action was instituted by Hal Conly, ia minor, by his next friend, Cheatham Conly, and also by Cheatham Conly in his own right, appellees, against the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, appellant. It is alleged in the complaint that Hal Conly was a minor fifteen years of age employed by the appellant; that he was engaged in unloading lumber, shipped in interstate commerce, from a ear; that because of the manner in which the lumber was loaded the work was hazardous, which fact, by reason of Conly’s youth and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. TonsellitoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- McCully v. Monongahela Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. ConlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923