Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Smethurst
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 30, 2001No. 2615, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLANDER, Judge.
This case has its genesis in the failure of various corporate and financial entities. Our task is to determine whether two residential lots located in the Harbor Pointe development in Salisbury, one owned by appellants George and Nancy Knapp, the other by appellants Milankumar and Miraben Shah, are subject to a second foreclosure action against Wyemoor Development Corporation (“Wyemoor”), with regard to an alleged debt of $2,340,709.6o. 1 The first foreclosure action was initiated in 1992 against Wyemoor by Second National Federal Savings Bank (“Second National” or the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Minh-Vu Hoang v. Hewitt Avenue Associates, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Griffin v. BiermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Town of La Plata v. Faison-Rosewick LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Reese v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Danaher v. Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.