Legal Opinion
Hill & Range Songs, Inc. v. Fred Rose Music, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 22, 1975No. Civ. 6785PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MORTON, District Judge.
This action was originally brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, by the plaintiff Hill & Range Songs, Inc., for a declaration of the renewal rights of that company in the United States copyrights of musical compositions by Hank Williams. Pursuant to motions for a change of venue filed by the defendants, the Honorable Irving Ben Cooper, District Judge, entered an order on November 2, 1972, transferring this cause to the Middle District of Tennessee.
Hill & Range Songs claims an interest in the copyright renewal rights…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Roger Miller Music, Inc., Shannon Miller TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- State v. MorlockWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Saroyan v. William Saroyan FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.