Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 14, 2015No. 2014-C-2607Published

1DissentJohnson, Chief Justice

hi respectfully dissent. Under the facts as presented here, the appellate court correctly ruled that plaintiffs have pled a cause of action to rescind sale of the mineral lease. In my view, plaintiffs properly raised the issue of fraud which would defeat the exception of no cause of action, and allow for further discovery and examination of the evidence surrounding this transaction. .

While the Mineral Code does not recognize a fiduciary duty owed by a lessee, Mineral Code article 122 does impose a duty to act as a reasonably prudent operator for the parties’ mutual benefit. As correctly noted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API