Legal Opinion

New England Tel. & Tel. v. ATTORNEY FOR NORFOLK DIST.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

374 Mass. 569 (1978)

373 N.E.2d 960

NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY

vs.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE NORFOLK DISTRICT.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.

January 5, 1978.

March 3, 1978.

Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, KAPLAN, & ABRAMS, JJ.

John M. Harrington, Jr. (Thomas B. Wheatley with him) for the plaintiff.

Matthew T. Connolly, Assistant District Attorney, for the defendant.

Francis X. Bellotti, Attorney General, Stephen R. Delinsky & Barbara A.H. Smith, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Commonwealth, amicus curiae, submitted a brief.

BRAUCHER, J.

The question…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McMahon v. Amoco Oil Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API