Legal Opinion

Ross Jewelers, Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1953No. 3 Div. 639PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

On application for rehearing we have concluded that the original opinion should be withdrawn and the present opinion substituted in lieu thereof. As we shall show the case involves certain phases of the Alabama Sales Tax Statutes where goods are sold and where the federal statutes require the imposition of what is known as the Federal Retail Excise Tax, commonly known as the Luxury Tax. While we feel that the opinion should be rewritten, the result under the facts in the case at bar will not be different, as we shall also undertake to show.

This is an appeal from a decree of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. State v. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Doby v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. VOYAGER INSURANCE COMPANIES v. WhitsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Sparks v. Brock & Blevins, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. Ex Parte Emerald Mountain Expressway BridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. ITT Canteen Corporation v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. In The Matter Of John David Fox, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API