Buckelew v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
Appeal from revocation of probation with reinstatement of a two year sentence.
Eleven assignments of error have been made in the bound copy of the record. In appellant’s brief they’are .argued in bulk. All except the eleventh assignment complain of rulings of the trial court admitting hearsay testimony given by an under cover investigator, one Otten. The eleventh assignment is bad because no specified ruling of the trial judge is cited in the assignment.
Another witness, one Weir, gave virtually the same evidence as did Otten. However, the questions reserved as to Weir’s testimony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Wright v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Schultz v. Pacific InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
- McNeely v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alabama v. SheltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- State v. HolcombWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Marquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.