Legal Opinion

ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 16, 2010No. 2009-C-1629Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 So.3d 192 (2010)

EXXONMOBIL PIPELINE COMPANY

v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 2009-C-1629.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 16, 2010.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 2010.

Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond, McCowan & Jarman, Gary A. Bezet, Gregory Michael Anding, Mark Andrew Marionneaux, Carol Galloway, Baton Rouge, for Applicant.

Phelps Dunbar, LLP, Michael Dale Hunt, Harry Alston Johnson, III, Baton Rouge, for Respondent.

GUIDRY, Justice.[*]

ExxonMobil Pipeline Company (hereinafter, "ExxonMobil") as a common carrier pipeline company seeks to expropriate land belonging to Union Pacific Railroad…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Southern Development Co. v. GrecoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Central La. El. Co. v. Covington & St. Tammany L. & I. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission v. WatsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. City of New Orleans v. MoeglichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API