Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Imburgia

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

Frank Imburgia, owner and proprietor of the hotel, has been named defendant in both actions. The defendant bartenders who, it is claimed, refused to wait upon the respective plaintiffs, were Harry Kovelesld and Hallie Brummett. Both actions are to recover penalties under article 4 of the Civil Eights Law for alleged racial discrimination in refusing to serve plaintiffs, who are Negroes, with drinks at a hotel bar.

The plaintiffs seek to examine defendants and also one Sam Imburgia, manager of the hotel, concerning whatever directions or authority may have been given to the bartenders with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Public National Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. George v. GobeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Nixon v. Beacon Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Sands v. ComerfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Town of Kirkwood v. AutenreithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Insurance v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hobson v. York Studios, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1955
  3. Industrial Linens Supply Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API