Legal Opinion

Davis v. International Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to restrain an alleged nuisance.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This is an action to restrain an alleged nuisance. The plaintiff is the owner of a house and lot fronting on Seneca street in the city of Buffalo. The building consists of a two-family apartment house, arranged for a family on the first floor and one on the second floor. One of these apartments was occupied and used by the plaintiffs; the other was let to tenants. In addition, Earl J. Davis occupied a room in front for the purpose of a barber shop. Alongside of the premises owned by the plaintiff was a vacant lot. This lot was purchased by the defendant subsequently to the erection and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Bohm v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Garvey v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Bly v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. International Ry. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Peter Styvesant Apts., Inc. v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API