Legal Opinion

Security Insurance v. Trustmark Insurance

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 5, 2003No. Civ. No. 3:01CV2198(PCD)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BY DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BY PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT AND WEB MANAGEMENT LLC

DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves to compel the production of documents by defendant. Third-Party Defendant TIG Insurance Company (“TIG”) separately moves to compel the production of documents by plaintiff, defendant and Web Management LLC’s (“Web”). For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs motion is granted and TIG’s motions are granted in part.

I. BACKGROUND

In the present action,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Eugene F. MARESCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EVANS CHEMETICS, DIV. of W.R. GRACE & CO., Defendants AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. North River Insurance v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. SN Servicing CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Deandre Burns, et al. v. Amazon.com Services LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API