Legal Opinion

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 3, 1996No. 95-3138PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The State concedes error in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court imposed a seven year sentence with a minimum mandatory sentence of three years to be served consecutively to a seven year sentence with no minimum mandatory portion. The state concedes that the sentence with the minimum mandatory provision should have been ordered to be served first in accordance with Palmer v. State, 571 So.2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). See also Pioquinto v. State, 656 So.2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Ricardo v. State, 608 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Therefore…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ricardo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Pioquinto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Palmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gregory L. Mattox Jr. v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API