Poteat v. King
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing respondent, a hearing commissioner of the Superior Court, to reopen his preliminary hearing in order to allow defense counsel to cross-examine a police detective and to call as a defense witness petitioner’s former girl friend, whom counsel believes to be the informant who supplied information to the police leading to petitioner’s arrest. We agree that the preliminary hearing must be reopened for these two purposes, and therefore we vacate respondent’s finding of probable cause. We go no further, however, because we believe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- William D. Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- George E. Ross, Jr. v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yeager v. GreeneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Turner v. BaylyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Turner v. BaylyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996