Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Harrison
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 27, 1982No. 1509PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court extending the time for the parties to comply with a judgment for specific performance after such judgment became final.
We affirm.
Appellees Ronny Harrison and wife Cheryl Harrison (Harrisons) initially sued appellants John M. Reynolds and Armanda Hogg (Reynolds and Hogg) seeking specific performance of a real estate contract. After a hearing before the court on January 19, 1979, the court on September 13, 1979, signed a judgment, approved by both counsel, ordering Reynolds and Hogg as vendors and the Harrisons as vendees…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tyler v. SheaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Lesser & Son v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bennett v. CopelandTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Ex Parte LohmullerTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Los Angeles Auto Tractor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Greiner v. Jameson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Adams Extract Co., Inc. v. Green Bay Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Tarrant CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Various Opportunities, Inc. v. Sullivan Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- Harris County Appraisal District v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.