Legal Opinion

United States v. $184,505.01 in U.S. Currency

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1995No. 94-3528, 94-3674 and 94-3675UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALITO, Circuit Judge:

In these appeals, Reginald D. McGlory challenges the district court’s refusal to set aside default judgments in three separate civil in rem forfeiture proceedings brought under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). 1 McGlory raises five separate issues — lack of notice, double jeopardy, wrong standard in refusing to set aside default judgments, insufficient reasons for refusing to set aside default judgment, and misstatement or fraud on the part of the government. Because we find that the government violated MeGlory’s due process rights by failing to provide him with…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. $184,505.01 in U.S. Currency Reginald D. McGlory Claimant-Appellant, United States of America v. $14,548.50 in U.S. Currency Reginald D. McGlory Claimant-Appellant, United States of America v. One Marble Indian Statue, One Replica Remington Rattlesnake Statue, Reginald D. McGlory Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API