Legal Opinion
People v. Lawrence
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: An issue concerning the interpretation or application of a criminal statute or a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the factual allegations of an indictment does not survive a defendant’s plea of guilty (see, People v Levin, 57 NY2d 1008, 1009, rearg denied 58 NY2d 824; People v Thomas, 53 NY2d 338, 340, 343-345). A guilty plea also forecloses any challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence before the Grand Jury (see, People v Simms, 269 AD2d 788; People v Buthy, 85 AD2d 890). Defendant’s contention that the evidence before the Grand Jury…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LevinNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. SimmsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. ButhyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. OswoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. HowingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HerronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. AristudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.