Moore v. State

concurring and dissenting to order granting motion for rehearing.

Finding nothing in the motion for rehearing that causes me to change my analysis, I would deny the motion for rehearing in its entirety. Finding nothing wrong with the Court’s original analysis that affirmed the judgment, as does the majority’s new analysis, I will adopt the Court’s *318original analysis as nay concurring opinion. No further analysis is necessary. I pause only to note that the majority’s decision to place all Brady violations in the type two category of violations under Marin flies in the face of Texas Court of…