Graton & Knight Co. v. Mayville Shoe Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Plaintiff owned and operated a tannery at Cudahy, Wisconsin. Defendant owned and operated a shoe factory at Mayville, Wisconsin. Joseph Brindis, its president and general manager, went to plaintiff’s tannery on May 17, 1941, and there called on Mr. Scherer, general manager. An agreement in writing was entered into, whereby plaintiff sold defendant two kinds of sole leather: Fifty thousand square feet of chrome retan bends, matched gold spot color; and seven thousand square feet of gold spot bends. The seven thousand square feet of gold spot bends were a product made at plaintiff’s Worcester,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- F. Dohmen Co. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Jordan v. Estate of WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Bourda v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Nehrling v. Herold Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Hart v. GodkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tri-Motors Sales, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963