Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Randolph
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In this ease Mrs. Randolph brought suit against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company to recover damages for injury caused by her slipping and falling on its store floor, made dangerous by its alleged negligence. She recovered a verdict, and from a judgment entered thereon defendant appeals. The substantial question involved is whether the trial court was constrained to give binding instructions for defendant.
The proofs tended to show defendant had a provision and' meat store which plaintiff patronized. In such store it had a pay telephone which customers used. To…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Mahoney v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Rankin v. S. S. Kresge Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1945
- De Soto Auto Hotel, Inc. v. Clarence McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Adams v. FerraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Helen R. Gibson and Charles E. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.