Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Randolph

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 14, 1933No. 4962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In this ease Mrs. Randolph brought suit against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company to recover damages for injury caused by her slipping and falling on its store floor, made dangerous by its alleged negligence. She recovered a verdict, and from a judgment entered thereon defendant appeals. The substantial question involved is whether the trial court was constrained to give binding instructions for defendant.

The proofs tended to show defendant had a provision and' meat store which plaintiff patronized. In such store it had a pay telephone which customers used. To…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rankin v. S. S. Kresge Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1945
  3. De Soto Auto Hotel, Inc. v. Clarence McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. Adams v. FerraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Helen R. Gibson and Charles E. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API