Legal Opinion

Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Jensen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1929No. 5693PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is another of the Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands cases.

In the present ease exceptions were taken to the instructions given by the court in reference to two witnesses for the appellant and one witness for the appellee. In commenting on the testimony of the first witness for the appellant, the court said: “Moreover, there is testimony that their agent in Minnei apolis made the same representations, LindT say and Fotheringham, and while Fotheringham denies it in his deposition, Lindsay has not been called to testify in respect to the matter. Having made that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. TipperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  3. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API